Closing a Company in Singapore: Should You Strike Off or Wind Up

Closing a company in Singapore? Our experts guide you through the strike-off or wind-up process to ensure compliance.

Muk Siew Peng | Licensed Insolvency Practitioner and Approved Liquidator in Singapore
Siew Peng Muk​​
March 10, 2026​ · 0
A black and orange closed sign hanging on an office door, illustrating business shutdown during a Creditors Voluntary Liquidation in Singapore.
creditors-voluntary-liquidation-singapore-closed-sign

Table of Contents

Closing a company in Singapore involves more than stopping operations.

Directors need to make sure the company’s assets, liabilities, tax obligations and statutory matters are properly dealt with before the entity is removed from the register.

For most local companies, the two main closure routes are:

  • striking off, where the company has already cleared its affairs; or
  • winding up, where assets, debts or other matters still need to be formally administered.

Choosing the correct route depends mainly on the company’s financial position and whether anything remains to be dealt with.

Key Takeaways

  • Strike-off is generally for inactive companies that have already cleared their affairs.
  • A company applying for strike-off should own nothing and owe nothing.
  • Winding up is a formal process for companies whose debts, assets or other affairs still need to be administered.
  • A Members’ Voluntary Liquidation (MVL) applies to a solvent company.
  • A Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation (CVL) applies where the company cannot continue because of its liabilities.
  • Compulsory winding up is a Court process and may be initiated by eligible parties, including creditors.

What Is a Company Strike-Off?

Striking off is an administrative process that removes a company’s name from ACRA’s register.

Once the process is completed, the company no longer legally exists.

A company should only apply once it meets ACRA’s striking-off criteria.

Current ACRA requirements include that the company:

  • has stopped trading or never started business;
  • has no unpaid debts or unresolved issues with government agencies;
  • has no registered charges;
  • is not involved in ongoing legal proceedings;
  • is not subject to ongoing or pending regulatory action;
  • owns nothing and owes nothing; and
  • has the required consent from its directors.

What About Tax Matters?

Before applying for strike-off, the company should settle all outstanding tax liabilities and filing obligations with IRAS.

IRAS may object to the ACRA strike-off application if tax matters remain unresolved.

Importantly, IRAS does not issue a tax clearance letter specifically for strike-off applications.

Pro Tip:

Check ACRA and IRAS separately before applying. ACRA focuses on whether the company meets the strike-off criteria, while IRAS may object if tax filings or liabilities remain unresolved.

Who Is Strike-Off Best Suited For?

Strike-off generally suits a company that:

  • has already ceased business;
  • has settled its creditors;
  • has dealt with its assets;
  • has no unresolved tax matters;
  • has no ongoing litigation; and
  • no longer requires a formal winding-up process.

What Is Winding Up or Liquidation?

Winding up (or liquidation) is the formal process of closing a company whose affairs still need to be administered.

Winding up may involve:

  • settling debts and obligations;
  • realising company assets;
  • reviewing creditor claims;
  • distributing remaining assets where applicable;
  • appointing a liquidator; and
  • making the required statutory filings.

It may be appropriate where the company still has debts, significant assets, creditor issues or other matters that cannot simply be cleared before strike-off.

Strike-Off vs. Winding Up

Factor Strike-Off Winding Up
Best suited for Inactive company whose affairs have already been cleared Company with remaining debts, assets or affairs to administer
Assets remaining No May remain
Liabilities remaining No May remain
Solvency Company should already own nothing and owe nothing Can be solvent or insolvent depending on the route
Liquidator required No Yes, under the applicable winding-up process
Main routes Administrative strike-off MVL, CVL or compulsory winding up
Creditor involvement Usually limited if everything is already settled Can be significant, especially in insolvency
Complexity Generally lower Generally higher

The key question is not simply which route is faster.

It is whether the company’s affairs have already been cleared or still require formal administration.

Types of Winding Up

1. Members’ Voluntary Liquidation (MVL)

A Members’ Voluntary Liquidation (MVL) is the voluntary winding-up route for a solvent company.

It may be suitable where a company:

  • has ceased or is ceasing operations;
  • can pay its debts in full;
  • still holds assets or capital;
  • requires a formal distribution process; or
  • wants a structured solvent wind-down.

The process is initiated by the company’s members, with the appointed liquidator administering the winding up and remaining assets.

2. Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation (CVL)

A Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation (CVL) applies where a company cannot continue because of its liabilities.

In a CVL:

  • the company enters a formal winding-up process;
  • a liquidator is appointed;
  • company assets are administered;
  • creditor claims are reviewed; and
  • distributions are made according to the applicable insolvency rules.

Creditors also have important rights in the administration of the winding up.

3. Compulsory Winding Up

Compulsory winding up is a Court process.

A creditor, the company or another eligible party may apply to the Court where the legal requirements are met.

One common insolvency ground arises where the company owes a creditor more than S$15,000, receives a written demand and fails for three weeks to pay, secure or compound the debt.

Receiving a statutory demand should therefore be treated seriously.

How Do You Choose Between Strike-Off and Winding Up?

The simplest starting point is to ask whether the company has already cleared all of its affairs.

Strike-Off May Fit Where:

  • the company has stopped trading;
  • no assets remain;
  • no liabilities remain;
  • tax matters are resolved;
  • no creditors remain unpaid;
  • no litigation or regulatory issues remain; and
  • no formal liquidation process is needed.

Winding Up May Fit Where:

  • debts remain to be settled;
  • assets still need to be realised or formally distributed;
  • the company is insolvent;
  • creditors need to participate in the closure;
  • formal administration is required; or
  • the company is solvent but still has substantial assets or capital to distribute.

Unsure Whether the Company Is Actually Insolvent?

Before choosing between strike-off, MVL or CVL, directors should understand whether the company is genuinely solvent.

A temporary cash-flow problem is not necessarily the same as insolvency.

Likewise, having some cash available does not automatically mean the company is financially healthy if large liabilities remain.

Cash Flow Crisis vs. Insolvency: How to Tell Which One Your Singapore Company Is Facing →

MVL or CVL?

Once directors know that liquidation is required, the next distinction is whether the company is solvent.

  • MVL is for a solvent company able to meet its debts.
  • CVL is for a company that cannot continue because of its liabilities.

For a more detailed comparison, see ClearView’s guide to MVL vs. CVL: Which Liquidation Strategy Is Right for Your Singapore Company?

What Happens If Directors Simply Walk Away?

Stopping work and ignoring the company is not the same as legally closing it.

As long as the company remains live, its compliance obligations can continue.

Remaining Assets

If a dissolved company still owns property, that property does not simply become available for directors or shareholders to take personally.

Assets should therefore be dealt with before dissolution.

Ongoing Filing and Compliance Problems

A company that remains registered may continue to have filing and regulatory obligations.

Directors should not assume that inactivity removes those responsibilities.

Director Disqualification

Director disqualification should not be confused with voluntarily striking off a compliant company.

ACRA can impose disqualification in specified circumstances involving repeated corporate compliance failures and companies struck off through enforcement.

The better approach is to deal with the closure formally rather than allow unresolved filings and compliance problems to accumulate.

Wrongful Trading

Delaying closure does not automatically make a director personally liable.

However, where a company continues incurring liabilities in circumstances that satisfy the statutory wrongful-trading requirements, personal exposure can arise.

Directors should therefore monitor the company’s actual financial position rather than simply allowing operations to continue without a credible plan.

Objections to Strike-Off

A strike-off application is not final immediately after filing.

The process allows affected parties to object before the company is finally removed from the register.

Creditor, shareholder and tax issues should therefore be resolved before the application is submitted wherever possible.

Why Early Advice Matters

The correct closure route depends on what remains inside the company.

Directors should understand:

  • whether the company is solvent;
  • whether creditors remain unpaid;
  • whether assets need to be distributed;
  • whether personal guarantees exist;
  • whether tax matters remain unresolved;
  • whether legal proceedings are outstanding; and
  • whether a liquidator-led process is required.

Early advice can help directors structure the closure properly before creditor pressure or regulatory problems reduce the available options.

Unsure Whether to Strike Off or Wind Up?

If your company is closing but still has assets, debts or creditor issues, the correct route depends on its actual financial position. ClearView can help assess whether strike-off, MVL or CVL is more appropriate.

Request a Confidential Consultation

Frequently Asked Questions

Is strike-off cheaper and faster than winding up?

Strike-off is generally a simpler administrative route because it is intended for companies whose affairs have already been cleared.

Winding up is more formal because assets, debts and other matters may still need to be administered.

Can a company with debts apply for strike-off?

A company applying for strike-off should own nothing and owe nothing.

If debts remain unresolved, directors should deal with them first or consider whether winding up is more appropriate.

Does a company need to be dormant before it can be struck off?

Not necessarily.

ACRA states that the company must have stopped trading or never started business and meet the other striking-off criteria.

Do I need an IRAS tax clearance letter?

No.

IRAS does not issue tax clearance letters specifically for strike-off applications.

Outstanding tax liabilities and filing obligations should still be settled before applying.

What is the difference between MVL and CVL?

An MVL is a voluntary winding-up route for a solvent company.

A CVL applies where the company cannot continue because of its liabilities.

Both involve the appointment of a liquidator, but the company’s solvency position and creditor involvement differ.

Can a creditor force a company into liquidation?

A creditor may apply for compulsory winding up if the statutory requirements are met.

One relevant situation is where a debt of more than S$15,000 remains unpaid, unsecured or uncompounded for three weeks after service of a written demand.

Does a company need a liquidator when it is struck off?

No.

Strike-off is an administrative process. A liquidator is appointed under the applicable winding-up process.

Can directors simply stop filing if the company has stopped trading?

No.

A company that remains registered generally continues to have compliance obligations until it is properly closed.

What happens if someone objects to the strike-off?

ACRA can stop the striking-off process while an accepted objection remains unresolved.

If the matter is not resolved within the applicable period, the application may lapse and the company may need to apply again later.

How do I know whether MVL, CVL or strike-off is the right option?

Start with the company’s financial position.

If the company has already cleared its affairs and owns and owes nothing, strike-off may be suitable.

If it is solvent but still has affairs or assets requiring formal administration, an MVL may be considered.

If it cannot continue because of its liabilities, a CVL may be more appropriate.